My take on religions
2006.06.13I was baptised. I went to a Catholic school. Basically, I was grown to be a Catholic. And I’m not.
As soon as I started asking myself questions, I began being dubious about religions. Not just Catholicism, all religions.
I think religions do more harm than good and usually, positive things about a religion can either be found somewhere else, too, or were introduced in that religion, through an evolutional process, with the help of free thinkers — often battled by the heads of that same religion.
Especially in the last centuries, we can see this liberal-induced evolution. Just two really quick examples:
- Women are — almost — no longer viewed as mere incubators
- We can work on Sundays/Saturdays without being considered sinners — mainly Protestants had this issue
But there are still a few major issue on which regards religions — I’m mostly talking about the Catholic Church simply because it’s the one I know best — are not willing to evolve. They act like they’re evolving, but it’s just a cover.
Want a few examples? Tolerance and willingness to openly debate are certainly not encouraged by many religions — if not all –, even though they pretend they do and almost everyone agrees they are important values in our society:
- New and revolutionary ideas have always been battled by religions. Religions fear changes and generally speaking — especially in the past — are against expanding knowledge to the base. Wasn’t the Earth flat and all planets and stars revolving around it?!
- What’s up with homosexual people being considered creatures of the devil? It’s not exactly a good example of tolerance
There would be many more examples, but this are really obvious and nobody, I repeat, NOBODY, can say they’re not real.
What I believe many religions teach — with, probably, the exception of Buddhism which is the religion I respect the most, mainly because I believe it’s more of a philosophy than a religion — is to punish and induce fear.
Children are raised to not do certain things because otherwise they’d be punished — thus the fear.
I believe children should be allowed to be what they are: children; they should be let free to experiment and they’re thirst of knowledge should be quenched with answers to their questions.
What’s up with not talking about sex with children?
I’m non saying you should tell a child: “Oh, yesterday night, I went out with my friends, we payed a hooker and screwed all night long!,” because it’d be impolite to do so with anybody — child or not — and it’s not what sex is about.
Children should be raised knowing what sex is — love, passion, and so on –, this way, they will have a healthy interest in it, not a morbose one: we all know children are interested in whatever is kept away from their eyes: I believe it’s a sin to pull the wool over a child’s eyes, not talking about sex with a child.
IMHO, religions don’t help kids to grow freely and to make them more “clever”.
Religion is something a person needs to take without questioning: questioning is not allowed inside a religion, thus kids are grown to be people that are not able/willing to question/think-freely — this is a bad generalization, but you get the whole point.
Not to talk that most people believe because they were told to believe, because their parents believe.
If you ask a person to tell you what he/she believes in, you’ll probably get dumb/funny answers. While the real answer should be: “Because I was told to,” “Because everyone in my community believes” and so on.
And what about those who consider themselves as good christians but don’t do what the Church tell them to do?
How many of those supposedly good christians have sex out of marriage? and how many have sex just because they want to? Oh, and who really apply this: “don’t judge unless you are yourself”?
And talking about sex, of course it’s better not to talk about sex with kids and tell them it’s wrong to use condoms, and then cope with HIV spreading all-over the World, instead, of simply saying the kids they should use a condom when they have sex, especially if they don’t really know the partner. Right?
What’s so bad about sex? Why shouldn’t I be able to make love with the girl I love?
Sex is something private which nobody — States, religions, whatever — can interfere with as long as nobody’s hurt.
I also can’t agree with many of Jesus’ teachings. One for all, Jesus preached punishment! Punishment?!
Oh yes, punishment is very useful to scare people and to make them repress their instinct and have them grow up as repressed and frustrated individuals.
And as a side note, I remember you all that those of you who don’t believe in the Holy Spirit won’t be forgiven and will rest in hell for eternity.
Many religions think they should be part of a country’s politic life and many politicians think that, too.
But if a State is, in its constitution, declared to be laic — take Italy and the USA as examples — they should be just that: laic!
Instead, if a State has got a state-religion — take Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc. –, it’s fine if religion plays a part in its politic life.
Finally, one more issue with religions: they don’t help preventing wars, instead, they motivate them.
In the past, wars were directly fought for — futile — religious reasons, nowadays they might be fought, indirectly, for that same futile reasons — not always, take the Middle East situation, for a “directly” example.
The Roman Church, for example, played a big part in past wars, both publicly, the Crusades — a quick digression: the Roman Church fought against muslims and killed many of them, while at the time, Islam was pretty open to other religions…can you find any analogies with our times? –, and undercover, take the Dirty War and Operation Condor in South America aimed at destabilizing Marxist regimes, which ended up killing — well they disappeared — countless innocent people.
To wrap this up, my idea is that religions are not only useless and based on misconception, but also detrimental.
I’m not saying religions should be erased from the face of the earth in no days: it should be a progressive change sided with a change to our educational system. Simply banning all religions would be even worse, because many people, because of bad education I must say, base all of their values on religion, thus they’d end up being without values.
People should learn that what’s good is what’s good for humanity and not what their religion says is good. They should also learn that what’s bad is what really does harm to another person, not what their religion says is bad.
And I’m not saying you’re stupid if you believe: you’re free to believe in whatever you want, but it’s important that you think about it, not just believe because everyone does or because you were told you so. I’ve had people — and ones I really have esteem for — saying it’s easy to be Godless, I say it’s even easier to believe.
Even though I’m adverse to religions, I truly believe everyone should be free to be what he want to be — religiously, sexually, etc. –, and that’s something I can’t see in many religious people. And it’s sad.
I think you might consider me an atheist, as I don’t believe in God and don’t see room for improvement.
But I’d prefer to consider myself neither atheist, nor agnostic, as none of the two really express how I feel — plus, I consider both to be, at an extent, Godless religions, but that will be part of another post.
I’m just a free-thinker who has his own ideas and who’d like everyone to have his/her own ideas.
P.S.
I know there are a few religious people reading this blog and I hope you won’t take this bad: it’s my opinion, it’s not my goal to offend anyone and I’m open to debate.
I’m not judging — nonetheless criticizing — those who believe and as I said I really respect those people; instead, I’m criticizing those who preach.
P.P.S.
Here’s the usual apology: I’m sorry for the hiatus — about two weeks — but as you can see the post rate has diminished sensibly during the past months and that’s for two reason: I’m aiming at longer, more insightful posts, and I’m damn busy — my projects, freelance work and finals at the doorstep. :)
I really do want to post more often, but many times I’m just too tired to write a good post. I hope you’ll forgive me…
This post was written 2 years ago on June 13th, 2006 early evening.



Daniel Morrison
2 years ago
Growing up protestant Christian, I will say that Christianity is about very good things like loving your enemies, fighting poverty and oppression, etc.
Does modern Christianity reflect that? I think Gandhi had it right.
Gianluca
2 years ago
I think that it’s possible a future change on Chatolich Church.
Priests are disappering and it is necessary to take a strategic change.
I am agree with many points of your analysis, but there is signal that I read under your written lines.
We need as humans to get responses: why do I live? which is my future destination? Which is the SENSE of all?
Gianluca
PS: Compliments for your good post.
(subscribed to comments)
ruzz
2 years ago
not going to be dragged into debate.. done it too many times.. but i just have to make two points and a suggestion.
to daniel’s question “Does modern Christianity reflect that? ” no it doesnt. but it certainly reflects it more than any other version of christianity. One only need look over the history of christianity to see the version floating around now is far less about destruction than it has been. That said, it still isn’t even close to jesus teachings.
to gianlucas question “why do i live” I would like you to ponder another question that reveals some human weaknesses when dealing with the first question. Why does a bird live, or a dog, or a tree? because they do, and they play a role in a larger organic system. Humans too. We just like to believe were special.
lastly, michele, I could not recommend more strongly that you read “The end of Faith” by Sam Harris. Its main subject is exactly the issue you discuss here, and his logic is so tight. It’s a hell of a read.
pun intended. ;)
(subscribed to comments)
Michele
2 years ago
@ Gianluca: those questions will probably never get an answer. Why?
Because we can’t answer those questions either because they don’t have an answer or because we haven’t got — and never will — the experience to answer them.
How does a religion help you in this?
We live because God wants that. So, why does God live? And who made God?
I don’t believe a god can be considere a necessary and sufficient cause.
In everyday life, effects almost always have a cause — I say almost because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle — which is directly or indirectly linked to that effect.
But IMHO, it’s wrong to assume us — as in humanity and the whole universe — as effects can have a cause, because even if there was such cause, one could always ask what caused it.
To sum it up, for small event under our direct control, it’s fine to presume there’s a necessary and sufficient cause, but there’s not for the universe as a whole.
@ Daniel: I believe ruzz is right: even though the Church became a tad more human than in the past, we’re far away for what it preach — and from what Jesus preached.
But another issue with religions is that they are anachronistic: religions were all created hundreds of years ago and barely evolved throughout history, which made them mostly inept to cope with today’s real issues.
So, a major revision should be put in place.
Andre
2 years ago
Beautiful post, completely shareable, at least from my point of view.
Religions are old, they’d need a rejuvenation process, while that’s the main thing they’re avoiding to do.
Religions have quite an amount of power in their hands, and as usual the presence of power implies the willing of having more. Not sure if I made my point…
The fact is that, to me, Religion = control. Hence all the interferences in politics, as in everyday life.
Referring to Catholicism, which is the religion I know best too, I have the feeling that something’s wrong.
The whole thing is based not on respectable values such as tolerance, brotherhood, love or be open-minded towards other people etc., but mostly on the one thing that is more effective, if your goal is that to have power and control masses of people: the sense of guilt.
That’s not how things are supposed to go, isn’t it?
Jorgeq
2 years ago
Very interesting entry. I had to go back and re-read it to fully understand your point but it came across quite well. Somewhat of a deep subject. Hope you don’t mind if you quote you someday…lol. Be well.
iris
2 years ago
i like to think life is a fantastic series of coincidences, chance and probabilities.
i think that makes it that much more special than if it were intended/construed/caused.
and that is why we must be that much more ethical and considerate, to really value life as it’s so fragile and unique.
religion used to be the politics of its time, the moral fiber, the set of social rules to live by. it had a practical use, it gave a structure to society.
but today, now that politics is dealt by the politicians (like the greek in their time before it lay dormant until the french revolution) it’s only a means of finding solace. and that, i respect, because it’s a psychological need.
(subscribed to comments)
Michele
2 years ago
@ iris: unfortunately, and that I can see in Italy (and maybe you can see the same thing in Spain, even though Zapatero managed to introduce a few interesting reforms), religion is not at all out of politics.
At least in Italy, every law which can directly or indirectly affect matters cared by the Church is influenced by the Pope or his spokespersons who try to block it by remembering politicians they’re catholics, without considering Italy is a laic nation.
As for your view of life, it’s definitely the most romantic way to view at it and I partly agree with it, because even though there were a scheme, it’s not for us to grasp.
We can’t and never will grasp the meaning/cause of life, and that’s for a simple reason: we will never be able to explain the universe, because it’s something we don’t have experience about.
Fabiana
1 year, 11 months ago
I really like that you think for yourself and encourage others to do the same, it would be a wonderful thing if people could actually do that.. the thing is some people just need religion.. cuz they`re not comfortable thinking for themselves.. I agree with Marx ;”Religion.. is the opium of the people”….
(subscribed to comments)
weisheng
1 year, 11 months ago
A very interesting take on religion, as an atheist I always have a hard time debating religion with the religious. Too often rather than thinking through the basic tenets of their religion and why it was founded, they simply use rhetorical statements of faith.
As an example, I once debated the concept of religion overnight with a friend and when stuck, she simply resorted to using the phrase “because God believes in me” or “because God sees fit”. I guess the logical approach of atheists and the spiritual approach of the religious are destined never to agree. Sadly, after professing that Christianity was the religion of love (in light of today’s Islamic terrorism), I reminded her of the Crusades of which she had never heard of.
Religion follows the word of a higher being through words written by Man. So are those words the work of Man or the work of God? The intolerance seen in so many monotheistic religions like Christianity and Islam is a flaw of humankind.
If only more sceptics of religion would speak out like you have. Thanks for your excellent article.
Michele
1 year, 11 months ago
@ Fabiana: I agree with you that some of those who believe just need a leader, someone to ask for help, someone to blame and something to explain things they don’t understand.
BTW, thanks for stopping by… :)
@ weisheng: I guess it will be a never-ending battle the one between the believer and the non-believer.
Most of the problem, IMHO, lies in the fact that religions mold ones mind to make her/him become a person who doesn’t like to question things and when faced with “logical assumptions” or facts tries to reply using dogmas that have been instilled in her/his mind during the years.
weisheng
1 year, 11 months ago
Then again, if people want to adhere to religious dogma faithfully, I actually don’t mind. I believe in freedom, diversity and tolerance. The real problem today is when people try to force their dogma on others and refuse to tolerate alternative viewpoints. That’s why we’ve had so much religious-inspired strife around the world throughout the millenia, and it’s still happening now. Having George Bush around hasn’t helped either.
Anthony
1 year, 10 months ago
I should qualify. This is what I’ve decided works for me and me alone in terms of living as a person of faith.
I have struggled with my faith for years. Being raised Christian, especially in the Southern Baptist Church makes one think that any questioning whatsoever is tantamount to blasphemy. That brand of Christianity is absolute. It is based on one interpretation of the Bible and it’s essential to accept that interpretation as an infallible document that leaves little if any room for interpretation. Of course, that same interpretation has justified racism, slavery and countless other human evils that have eventually fallen out of favor in the mainstream. We’ve got a long way to go on race in America, but at least a candidate can no longer be considered viable if he or she is a blatant segregationist. Trent Lott would likely disagree, but still…
From the amount of study I’ve done, I know that the Bible is the work of men. And it’s a work that has been changed, edited, added to and subtracted from by some very, very fallible men.
I have come to the slightly New-Agey conclusion that things are not as absolute as all the various religions tell us they are. I do believe in God. But in my opinion, God is bigger than any one religion. In fact, I think God’s test for humanity is to see if we can find a way to live together without killing each other in His name. So far, we’ve failed. Ann Coulter would have us believe that the solution is to invade the offending countries, kill their leaders and convert their population to Christianity. Yeah. Cause the Crusades really turned out well, didn’t they?
I do not believe that there is one true shining path to Heaven, and most Christians will use that belief to say that I am not a real Christian. So be it. I think that the basic tenets of all the big religions are fundamentally the same, and we fight wars over the details. To choose Christianity, for me, is to just choose to live by the teachings of Jesus. Now, I’ve broken any number of the Ten Commandments, and in no way does my life live up to the account of Christ’s life in the Bible. I’m certainly not aspiring to be a master proselytizer. I think you can lead by example. I try to be nice. That’s basically the root of my life. I try to be honest, nice, helpful and generous. If I can work from that premise, things will be cool.
But those details…whew…once you get into those it’s a slippery slope. It’s the inconsistencies that kill me. People will rage vitriolically when someone breaks the Levitical law prohibiting gay sex, but those same loudmouths will totally ignore all the other laws like touching pigs and sitting near a menstrual wife. Now, my wife may be grumpy once a month, but that’s no need for me to avoid sitting with her, is it?
(subscribed to comments)
Stahn
1 year, 10 months ago
Hi! I’m gonna make a very quick comment about religions:
They’re not so far from Nazism. Both take children and start brainwashing them at an early age.
When a kid is influenced at that age, they aren’t smart enough to apply a logical reasoning and differentiate between ideology (religion, political position, even sports can be applied to this) and truth (I mean, you can’t deny the truth).
Everyone should read some philosophy books. Psychology should help too.