Books vs Movies

This morning, I bought a couple of books. One is Fight Club by Chuck Palahniuk.

I bought it because I’d like to see how he writes and I always wanted to see the movie: usually, I prefer to see a movie based on a book, after having read the book.
But now I’m not sure that it is the best thing to do.

What I’ve always thought is that if you see the movie and then read the book you enjoy the second less, because you already know what the story is: no suspence.
But what if you read the book first and love it and then you watch the movie and you don’t like it: it’d be a delusion. For example, I know many Lord of the Rings books’ fans - I’m not a real one, though I like Tolkien a lot - that were so disappointed with the movies; but I know many that didn’t read the books before viewing the movies, they loved them and now they love the books.
So, maybe, it is better to see the movie first, because, usually, the book is more detailed, so you can read things that weren’t in the movie. The story is deeper. And well, if the movie sucks you can always hope the book’s better!

Now, I have to decide if I want to read Fight Club first, or if I want to watch Fight Club first. :???:

What is your personal opinion about the Book vs Movie battle?

This post was written 4 years ago on December 5th, 2004 early evening.

Change color scheme

Recently

Best of 2007

As usual, here’s my Best of… for 2007. Best Books This list includes books I’ve read this year, which weren’t necessarily released in 2007. Gomorrah by Roberto Saviano La..

Future of music

In the past few years, I realized how difficult it is to find new talented artist through mainstream media, and that was probably the main reason I started loosing interest in music, which had been a..

Alexa Certified Traffic Ranking for finotto.org